Asus M4A785TD-V EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics6.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive44.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M4A785TD-V EVO  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 28 '15 at 13:31
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 B45
AM3, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 55.5
2-Core 111
38% 83.2 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 147
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 40% Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT
Device(0000 0000) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4052
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
6.55% Terrible
Lighting 8.63
Reflection 9.19
Parallax 2.78
7% 6.87 fps
MRender 7.86
Gravity 7
Splatting 6.04
6% 6.97 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.55%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.1% Average
Read 207
Write 212
Mixed 206
47% 208 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 15.2
69% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 22.4
DQ Write 73.5
DQ Mixed 15.4
21% 37.1 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 104%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
310GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 105
Write 88.3
Mixed 59.7
63% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.24
4K Mixed 0.15
52% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 69%
SanDisk SDSSDP128G 126GB
12GB free, PID 2329
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 22.8
Write 19.9
Mixed 19.4
26% 20.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.91
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 3.42
400% 5.68 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 57%
Typical M4A785TD-V EVO Builds (Compare 178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A785TD-V EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $172
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback