Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2880 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 12 '21 at 08:10
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 93.2
1-Core 115
2-Core 230
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 828
76% 639 Pts
64-Core 1,181
73% 1,181 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Nvidia(10DE 139E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
115% Outstanding
Lighting 149
Reflection 153
Parallax 147
122% 150 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 136
Splatting 114
114% 144 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 115%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
355GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1154 891 874 872 870 864 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 2513
Write 2,019
Mixed 1,662
SusWrite 921
397% 1,779 MB/s
4K Read 59.7
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 62.9
208% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 812
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 439
348% 500 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 245%
Great: 355%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
895GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 470 472 470 470 471 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 470
Mixed 415
SusWrite 470
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 63.7
4K Mixed 41.4
136% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 352
251% 324 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 105%
Great: 121%
Intel MEMPEK1W032GA 29GB
27GB free
Firmware: K3110310
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 241 261 259 261 259 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 1,192
Write 258
Mixed 431
SusWrite 246
116% 532 MB/s
4K Read 161
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 92.5
397% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 942
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 408
350% 536 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 209%
Great: 328%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 199 203 203 196 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 148
Mixed 82.6
SusWrite 196
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 108%
Great: 114%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$166
890GB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 136 137 136 134 135 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB
25GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 39.5
Write 20.1
Mixed 26
SusWrite 20.9
34% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 10.2
4K Mixed 2.3
448% 6.2 MB/s
DQ Read 8.3
DQ Write 10.8
DQ Mixed 2.3
476% 7.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW64GX4M2D3600C18 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 40.1
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 31.3
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 39
SC Mixed 25.1
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 101%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 1,004 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $669
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback