HP 200 G3 AiO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP 200 G3 AiO  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8431
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190902
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 12 '21 at 06:20
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver J5005
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
40.1% Average
Memory 40.1
1-Core 60.3
2-Core 118
40% 72.7 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 235
31% 233 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605
HP(103C 8431) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
3.27% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 4
3% 3.73 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 4.8
4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 3.27%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
890GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 388 372 350 390 389 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 414
Write 404
Mixed 373
SusWrite 378
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 52.2
170% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 354
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 109%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905700-076.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29% Poor
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 12.1
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4.1
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 202
20% 202 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 200 G3 AiO Builds (Compare 112 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP 200 G3 AiO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback