ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell PowerEdge R900

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	80GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 80GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Dell PowerEdge R900
Motherboard	Dell PowerEdge R900 (all builds)
Memory	77.6 GB free of 80 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101111
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 12 '21 at 01:19
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X7460 19 User benchmarks, average bench 33% CPU1, 4 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	Memory 38.3 1-Core 38 2-Core 76.4 30% 50.9 Pts	4-Core 153 8-Core 304 27% 228 Pts	64-Core 910 56% 910 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Zotac(19DA 1214) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.74% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 0.5 2% 1.3 fps	MRender 2.8 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 2.1 2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.74% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Dell PERC 6/i 291GB 188GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 93 87 87 93 94 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Dell PERC 6/i 2TB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 897GB free Firmware: 1.22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 180 179 174 184 184 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Read 83.3 Write 111 Mixed 56.4 SusWrite 180 78% 108 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 7.4 4K Mixed 1 332% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 130%
Dell PERC 6/i 640GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 574GB free Firmware: 1.22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 47 45 45 48 47 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.7% Below average	Read 72.3 Write 52 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 44.8 34% 46.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 39%
WD Elements 25A1 4TB 8,402 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 823GB free, PID 25a1 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Read 30.3 Write 24.4 Mixed 22.9 SusWrite 18.9 32% 24.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 0.9 154% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 61%
WD Elements 25A1 4TB 8,402 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 3.5TB free, PID 25a1 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 18 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Read 30.3 Write 21.9 Mixed 21.6 SusWrite 18.8 30% 23.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M395T5750CZ4-CE61 80CE80B380CE M395T5750CZ4-CE61 80AD808980AD HYMP151F72CP4N3-Y5 80AD808980AD HYMP151F72CP4N3-Y5 80CE80B380CE M395T5750CZ4-CE61 80CE80B380CE M395T5750CZ4-CE61 80AD808980AD HYMP151F72CP4N3-Y5 80AD808980AD HYMP151... 80GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667 MHz 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20.6% Poor	MC Read 11 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 7 22% 7.83 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 3.2 9% 3.27 GB/s	Latency 211 19% 211 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 21%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback