HP Pavilion Laptop

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive156% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Laptop  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8615
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210104
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 11 '21 at 19:17
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 67.6
1-Core 118
2-Core 226
75% 137 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 552
54% 443 Pts
64-Core 544
34% 544 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
HP(103C 8615) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 14.8
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 20.6
12% 15.9 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 16.4
Splatting 11.8
11% 13.2 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG-8310A 512GB
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80003C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 650 611 374 342 284 312 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 1,034
Write 700
Mixed 508
SusWrite 429
148% 668 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 52.7
183% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 710
DQ Write 716
DQ Mixed 586
475% 671 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 156%
Great: 182%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
29GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 9 9.5 6.8 7 6.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 80.7
Write 15
Mixed 24.4
SusWrite 8.5
33% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.6
58% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1P26KC8T1-BXPS 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (81st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.2% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 27.2
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 23.4
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Laptop Builds (Compare 116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Laptop

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback