ECS H61H2-M4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardECS H61H2-M4  (all builds)
Memory7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130913
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMar 11 '21 at 16:16
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 86
1-Core 99.7
2-Core 187
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 355
39% 309 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Gigabyte(1458 2312) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.2.3
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.5% Average
Lighting 62.5
Reflection 59
Parallax 89.2
51% 70.2 fps
MRender 59.8
Gravity 61.5
Splatting 43.5
44% 54.9 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 199 74 57 71 32 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.5% Poor
Read 220
Write 205
Mixed 195
SusWrite 90.3
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 0.5
42% 10.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 92%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
215GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 97 103 103 101 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 119
Write 110
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 100
64% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-050.A00LF V01L3LF4GB26826816 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.9% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61H2-M4 Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H61H2-M4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback