Gbt___ AWRDACPI

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gbt___ AWRDACPI (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-K8N51GMF-9
Memory	1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20060509
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 10 '21 at 17:47
Run Duration	268 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	53%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Dual Core AMD Opteron 180 77 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Socket 939, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	23.2% Poor	Memory 34.4 1-Core 28.2 2-Core 65.8 25% 42.8 Pts	4-Core 70.6 8-Core 69.1 9% 69.8 Pts	64-Core 70.8 4% 70.8 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6100 335 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 64MB Ram: 64MB, Driver: 309.08 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.05% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 0.1 Parallax 0.1 0% 0.1 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.05% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX900 128GB-$103 6,500 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 55 85 98 97 94 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.8% Below average	Read 126 Write 91.6 Mixed 105 SusWrite 81.3 23% 101 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 29.8 4K Mixed 22.1 73% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 40 DQ Write 47.7 DQ Mixed 36 29% 41.2 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$60 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 213GB free Firmware: CC24 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 110 129 134 133 122 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	Read 142 Write 119 Mixed 64.1 SusWrite 125 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 113%
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB 10,663 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 362GB free Firmware: 15.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 64 71 75 76 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	42.2% Average	Read 74.5 Write 70 Mixed 44.5 SusWrite 72.3 48% 65.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 72%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 62GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 10 25 26 27 27 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 76%
Seagate ST3250620NS 250GB-$45 1,571 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 20GB free Firmware: 3.AE SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 40 44 43 41 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	27% Poor	Read 51.1 Write 53.3 Mixed 35.9 SusWrite 42.5 34% 45.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 44%
WD WD2000JS-00MHB0 200GB 2,544 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 21GB free Firmware: 02.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 50 56 58 57 54 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	32.3% Below average	Read 57.3 Write 56.8 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 54.5 39% 52.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 196% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	8.15% Terrible	MC Read 2.8 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 2.4 7% 2.57 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 1.6 6% 2.23 GB/s	Latency 230 17% 230 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 8.15% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical AWRDACPI Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 15%

Tree trunk

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

System: Gbt___ AWRDACPI

CPU
Pentium 4 3.00GHzIntelBench 29%, 6,937 samples	11x
Pentium D 3.40GHzIntelBench 32%, 3,806 samples	7x
Pentium D 3.20GHzIntel $100Bench 31%, 938 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce 6200NvidiaBench 0%, 1,060 samples	4x
Radeon X1300AMDBench 0%, 685 samples	3x
GeForce 7600 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 1,208 samples	3x

SSD
AS350 128GBApacerBench 65%, 2,222 samples	3x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	2x
XPG SX900 128GBAdata $103Bench 68%, 6,500 samples	1x

RAM
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	11x
2GBUnknownBench 15%, 9,823 samples	6x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gbt___ AWRDACPI

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Gbt___ AWRDACPI

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)