Gbt___ AWRDACPI

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gbt___ AWRDACPI (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-K8N51GMF-9
Memory	1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20060509
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 01 '20 at 19:59
Run Duration	260 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Dual Core AMD Opteron 180 77 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Socket 939, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	40.2% Average	Memory 68.7 1-Core 35.7 2-Core 70.8 39% 58.4 Pts	4-Core 70.8 8-Core 71.2 9% 71 Pts	64-Core 70.9 4% 70.9 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6100 335 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 64MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.9038 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.07% Terrible	Lighting 0.13 Reflection 0.12 Parallax 0.25 0% 0.17 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.07% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX900 128GB-$103 6,500 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 86 93 97 93 93 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.2% Below average	Read 118 Write 94.2 Mixed 107 SusWrite 90.1 23% 102 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 30.6 4K Mixed 18.6 71% 23.2 MB/s	DQ Read 50.1 DQ Write 49 DQ Mixed 35.4 30% 44.8 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: CC24 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 144 155 159 156 156 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	91.2% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 147 Mixed 77.8 SusWrite 151 99% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 91.2% Great: 113%
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB 10,663 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 379GB free Firmware: 15.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 73 73 75 75 75 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Read 78.7 Write 79.6 Mixed 44.5 SusWrite 73.4 51% 69 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 72%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$34 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 212GB free Firmware: 05.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 12 17 18 23 24 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 76%
Seagate ST3250620NS 250GB-$45 1,571 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 23GB free Firmware: 3.AEG SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 62 64 65 65 65 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	Read 66.9 Write 68.4 Mixed 40 SusWrite 64.5 44% 60 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 44%
WD WD2000JS-00MHB0 197GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 24GB free Firmware: 02.01C03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 56 56 57 58 59 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.7% Below average	Read 56.6 Write 54.6 Mixed 42.6 SusWrite 56.8 39% 52.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.2 207% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.1% Very poor	MC Read 2.9 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 2.4 7% 2.6 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 2.7 8% 2.93 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical AWRDACPI Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 15%

Tree trunk

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

System: Gbt___ AWRDACPI

CPU
Pentium 4 3.00GHzIntelBench 29%, 6,937 samples	11x
Pentium D 3.40GHzIntelBench 32%, 3,806 samples	7x
Pentium D 3.20GHzIntel $100Bench 31%, 938 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce 6200NvidiaBench 0%, 1,060 samples	4x
Radeon X1300AMDBench 0%, 685 samples	3x
GeForce 7600 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 1,208 samples	3x

SSD
AS350 128GBApacerBench 65%, 2,222 samples	3x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	2x
XPG SX900 128GBAdata $103Bench 68%, 6,500 samples	1x

RAM
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	11x
2GBUnknownBench 15%, 9,823 samples	6x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gbt___ AWRDACPI

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Gbt___ AWRDACPI

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)