Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 09 '21 at 11:12
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 196
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 593
60% 485 Pts
64-Core 791
49% 791 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1565 MHz, MLim: 1920 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Lighting 44.3
Reflection 49.8
Parallax 43.4
36% 45.8 fps
MRender 42
Gravity 45.3
Splatting 39.6
34% 42.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 304 306 300 305 308 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 498
Write 311
Mixed 280
SusWrite 311
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 30.6
115% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 219
194% 290 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 129%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
715GB free
Firmware: JA0OA710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 99 99 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 91.4
Write 78.9
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 98.2
55% 76 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 57%
Samsung SSD 860 EVO 500G 500GB
244GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 321 325 337 346 359 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
254% Outstanding
Read 391
Write 380
Mixed 349
SusWrite 342
496% 365 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 37.8
4K Mixed 31.4
2,457% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 31.4
DQ Write 48.4
DQ Mixed 37.2
3,028% 39 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 254%
Great: 341%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 44.7
MC Write 41.1
MC Mixed 36.4
116% 40.7 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 39.5
SC Mixed 31.4
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,669 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $649
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback