ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 2325TT1

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Lenovo 2325TT1 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 2325TT1
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130430
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 09 '21 at 08:50
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199 30,496 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Memory 81.3 1-Core 87.3 2-Core 140 63% 103 Pts	4-Core 206 8-Core 204 28% 205 Pts	64-Core 205 13% 205 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 21FA) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.44% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 2 Parallax 3 3% 3.07 fps	MRender 4.7 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 5.2 4% 4.13 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.44% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Smart-240GB 240GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 131GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0519A SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 90 13 88 16 81 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 407 Write 386 Mixed 182 SusWrite 52.8 57% 257 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 48.5 4K Mixed 0.4 53% 22.2 MB/s	DQ Read 73.9 DQ Write 21.7 DQ Mixed 0.5 13% 32 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 0443 RMT3170EB68F9W1600 8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 16.9 51% 18 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 15.6 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 78.2 51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback