Asus G750JW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAsus G750JW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G750JW
Memory17.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 22 '17 at 23:30
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 196
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 506
54% 433 Pts
64-Core 507
31% 507 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 765M
Asus(1043 119D) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 369.9
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.24% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 2.23
Parallax 3.25
2% 2.66 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 3.83
3% 3.13 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 2.24%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 520
Write 386
Mixed 369
94% 425 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 25.4
116% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 39.6
70% 136 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 113%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$60
696GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 122
Write 126
Mixed 111
90% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.23
94% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 M471B5173BH0-YK0 M471B1G73QH0-YK0 M471B5173BH0-YK0 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.6% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.4
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18.7
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G750JW Builds (Compare 393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G750JW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $408
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback