Asus K42F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics0.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive14.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus K42F  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K42F
Memory2.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100903
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateMar 09 '21 at 02:48
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium P6100
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 18.9
2-Core 35.4
12% 27.2 Pts
4-Core 17.8
8-Core 31.5
3% 24.6 Pts
64-Core 25.7
2% 25.7 Pts
Poor: 21% Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Asus(1043 1702) 2.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.36% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.7 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.57 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.36%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 102 16 4.2 9.4 3.3 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.6% Very poor
Read 94.9
Write 98.4
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 36.3
17% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 4.6
23% 7.3 MB/s
DQ Read 59.5
DQ Write 25.4
DQ Mixed 25
23% 36.6 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD3-1600 04CB 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.32% Terrible
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 3
10% 3.43 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 1
SC Mixed 0.5
2% 0.63 GB/s
Latency 1,016
4% 1,016 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K42F Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K42F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback