Asus K42F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus K42F  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K42F
Memory2.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100903
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '21 at 14:18
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium P6100
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Memory 41.1
1-Core 19.5
2-Core 29
21% 29.9 Pts
4-Core 33.5
8-Core 36
5% 34.8 Pts
64-Core 35.3
2% 35.3 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Asus(1043 1702) 2.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.38% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.7 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.5
0% 0.63 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.38%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 146 59 63 75 68 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.4% Poor
Read 174
Write 128
Mixed 136
SusWrite 93.6
30% 133 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 8.7
27% 8.57 MB/s
DQ Read 92.6
DQ Write 52.4
DQ Mixed 40.8
39% 61.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD3-1600 04CB 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 5.3
15% 5.17 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 4
10% 3.63 GB/s
Latency 197
20% 197 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K42F Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K42F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback