| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 22.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus P8H61-M LE (all builds) |
| Memory | 3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110510 |
| Uptime | 3.5 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 08 '21 at 19:40 |
| Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
| Run User | ISR-User |
| Background CPU | 10% |
PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
52.5%
Above average
|
62% 98.1 Pts
|
16% 133 Pts
|
12% 194 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
|
0.82%
Terrible
|
1% 1.03 fps
|
1% 1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 23 5.8 5.7 5.5 MB/s
|
22.5%
Poor
|
16% 76.8 MB/s
|
47% 11 MB/s
| |
|
XDISK X9 500GB
27GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 29 28 29 27 MB/s
|
15.1%
Very poor
|
38% 28.6 MB/s
|
70% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905403-038.A00G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
37.9%
Below average
|
37% 13 GB/s
|
25% 8.63 GB/s
|
59% 68.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8H61-M LE Builds (Compare 1,014 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE - $134
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 163x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 110x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 83x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 158x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 79x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 35x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $211 |