Supermicro X8SAX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive18.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSupermicro X8SAX  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X8SAX
Memory9.2 GB free of 14.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 08 '21 at 13:26
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 930-$149
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 93.9
1-Core 75.6
2-Core 144
65% 105 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 366
38% 304 Pts
64-Core 359
22% 359 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 580
Nvidia(10DE 063A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.67% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 2
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.4 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 2.5
2% 2.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.67%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ VERTEX 256GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 26 21 21 21 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 41.1
Write 58.1
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 27.3
9% 40.5 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 8.7
50% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 28.6
DQ Write 6.1
DQ Mixed 2.3
6% 12.3 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ATMEL 26DF321 50GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 33 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 36864 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
53.8% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 20.1
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.7
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 59.9
67% 59.9 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X8SAX Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

System: Supermicro X8SAX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $239
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback