bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics69.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive318% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel NUC6i7KYB
Memory58 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200909
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 08 '21 at 04:28
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6770HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 108
2-Core 212
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 525
52% 426 Pts
64-Core 527
33% 527 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1788 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.30.02
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.4% Good
Lighting 82.6
Reflection 115
Parallax 148
67% 115 fps
MRender 88
Gravity 102
Splatting 81.7
73% 90.6 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
650GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1690 1935 1605 1408 1409 1432 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
318% Outstanding
Read 2,281
Write 1,721
Mixed 1,402
SusWrite 1,580
391% 1,746 MB/s
4K Read 64.8
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 90.8
300% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 909
DQ Write 764
DQ Mixed 847
632% 840 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 318%
Great: 410%
Lexar microSD RDR 32GB
1GB free, PID b051
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 69.3
Write 26.4
Mixed 36.5
49% 44.1 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 5.7
360% 5.9 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 38%
Verbatim Store n Go V3 USB 3.0 32GB-$7
4GB free, PID 0243
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 28 26 21 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 100
Write 32.1
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 25.5
48% 44.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0
24% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 34%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
4GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 34 35 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 100
Write 29.1
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 34.4
66% 55.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.6
141% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16S4/32G 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 50.9
MC Write 57.3
MC Mixed 28.8
130% 45.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 41
SC Mixed 22.2
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 120%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,495 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback