bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics85.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive330% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel NUC6i7KYB
Memory60 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200909
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '21 at 03:37
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6770HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 109
2-Core 164
74% 121 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 527
54% 433 Pts
64-Core 530
33% 530 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1663 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.30.02
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.1% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 112
Parallax 191
89% 138 fps
MRender 85.4
Gravity 125
Splatting 77.7
77% 96.1 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
650GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1704 1985 1655 1481 1483 1481 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
330% Outstanding
Read 2487
Write 2,178
Mixed 1,340
SusWrite 1,631
428% 1,909 MB/s
4K Read 65
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 92.3
298% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 941
DQ Write 770
DQ Mixed 851
638% 854 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 330%
Great: 410%
Lexar microSD RDR 32GB
1GB free, PID b051
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 78.4
Write 27.3
Mixed 19.9
42% 41.9 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 5.7
390% 5.9 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 38%
WDC WD40 01FAEX-00MJRA0 4TB
838GB free, PID 0611
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 124 125 125 125 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 116
Write 111
Mixed 74.2
SusWrite 123
143% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.9
143% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 57%
Verbatim Store n Go V3 USB 3.0 32GB-$7
4GB free, PID 0243
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 82.5
Write 28.9
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 26
41% 37.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 19%
Great: 34%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
4GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 35 35 36 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 104
Write 32.6
Mixed 66
SusWrite 35
71% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 2.9
197% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16S4/32G 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 51.5
MC Write 56.5
MC Mixed 28.5
130% 45.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 39.7
SC Mixed 21
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 119%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,495 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback