ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-1785

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 60% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	83.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	260% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Micro-Star GT72VR 7RE
Motherboard	MSI MS-1785 (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180315
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 08 '21 at 02:05
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	URY-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	Memory 85.7 1-Core 116 2-Core 221 80% 141 Pts	4-Core 391 8-Core 590 61% 490 Pts	64-Core 601 37% 601 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% MSI(1462 11AF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2177 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	83.6% Excellent	Lighting 99.5 Reflection 136 Parallax 104 81% 113 fps	MRender 103 Gravity 104 Splatting 114 88% 107 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75 109,999 User benchmarks, average bench 244% 347GB free (System drive) Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1174 1039 996 1000 1003 1019 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	260% Outstanding	Read 1,866 Write 1,745 Mixed 1,570 SusWrite 1,038 349% 1,555 MB/s	4K Read 49.7 4K Write 157 4K Mixed 72.9 252% 93.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1102 DQ Write 861 DQ Mixed 1,021 753% 995 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 260% Great: 297%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 535GB free Firmware: JB0OA3U0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 78 81 82 83 82 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	62.9% Good	Read 138 Write 125 Mixed 29.9 SusWrite 81.2 68% 93.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 75%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 60,540 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 784GB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 114 119 123 125 125 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	62.7% Good	Read 99.9 Write 130 Mixed 85.3 SusWrite 118 80% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.7 189% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 66%
WD My Passport 25E2 2TB 8,938 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 593GB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 90 90 90 90 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	35.4% Below average	Read 67.5 Write 68.4 Mixed 40.1 SusWrite 90 91% 66.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston MSI24D4S7S8MB-8 2x8GB 20,148 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 30.8 MC Mixed 22.4 79% 27.6 GB/s	SC Read 18 SC Write 31.4 SC Mixed 24.2 70% 24.5 GB/s	Latency 71.5 56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical MS-1785 Builds (Compare 549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 47%

Yacht

Desktop

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI MS-1785

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	353x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	185x
Core i7-6820HKIntelBench 69%, 20,362 samples	9x

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	329x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	218x
GTX 980MNvidiaBench 41%, 14,160 samples	1x

SSD
RBU-SNS8152S3256GG5 256GBKingstonBench 79%, 7,907 samples	153x
THNSNJ128G8NY 128GBToshibaBench 73%, 7,789 samples	39x
THNSNJ256G8NY 256GBToshibaBench 76%, 12,683 samples	36x

RAM
MSI24D4S7S8MB-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 71%, 20,148 samples	234x
MSI24D4S7D8MB-16 1x16GBKingstonBench 41%, 5,745 samples	44x
MSI24D4S7D8MB-16 2x16GBKingstonBench 77%, 1,520 samples	36x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback