ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus GL553VE

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus GL553VE (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK GL553VE
Memory	7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190429
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Mar 08 '21 at 00:25
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Memory 81.7 1-Core 97.4 2-Core 176 69% 118 Pts	4-Core 343 8-Core 575 56% 459 Pts	64-Core 547 34% 547 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) 105,856 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 15E0) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6172 Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.8% Poor	Lighting 37.8 Reflection 6.4 Parallax 38.1 31% 27.4 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 40 Splatting 26.7 28% 35 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB 39,780 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 132GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30200P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 215 167 212 256 260 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	Read 419 Write 254 Mixed 217 SusWrite 221 62% 278 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 59.6 4K Mixed 23.7 98% 35.6 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 150 150% 243 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 83%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 274GB free Firmware: JB0OA3V0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 81 81 81 81 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	44.8% Average	Read 75 Write 76.5 Mixed 18.7 SusWrite 80.9 45% 62.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 109% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 75%
It-ceo Storage 1TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 871GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 39 39 40 41 40 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	21.5% Poor	Read 36.2 Write 33.3 Mixed 22.3 SusWrite 38 24% 32.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 126% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 60%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 389GB free Firmware: 0708 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 68 64 64 72 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Read 58.5 Write 101 Mixed 98.3 SusWrite 68.7 61% 81.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.5 180% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GB 62,266 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.2% Good	MC Read 25.8 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 20.8 69% 24 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 23.5 SC Mixed 21.1 56% 19.5 GB/s	Latency 77.5 52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical GL553VE Builds (Compare 1,614 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus GL553VE

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	1,344x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	270x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	965x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	649x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	156x
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	135x
SD8SN8U128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 7,802 samples	130x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	214x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	211x
76.D305G.D390B 1x16GBUnknownBench 41%, 6,956 samples	159x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback