Clevo P370EM

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	90.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Clevo P370EM (all builds)
Motherboard	CLEVO P370EM
Memory	2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20121204
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 07 '21 at 19:18
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Memory 96.8 1-Core 89 2-Core 175 72% 120 Pts	4-Core 277 8-Core 434 44% 355 Pts	64-Core 444 28% 444 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670MX 2,325 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Clevo(1558 0371) 3GB CLim: 601 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 425.31 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	17.8% Very poor	Lighting 25.5 Reflection 13 Parallax 16.9 21% 18.5 fps	MRender 15.6 Gravity 16 Splatting 13.4 12% 15 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 130GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0CB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 243 279 278 279 279 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	Read 470 Write 449 Mixed 360 SusWrite 261 86% 385 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 50.8 4K Mixed 38.2 125% 40.6 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 228 209% 321 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 118%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 500GB-$59 9,994 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 376GB free Firmware: JF3OA0D0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 102 102 100 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	56.6% Above average	Read 96.1 Write 101 Mixed 55.1 SusWrite 101 65% 88.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 1x4GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	40.9% Average	MC Read 14.6 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 11.5 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 12.1 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 51 78% 51 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P370EM Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

System: Clevo P370EM

CPU
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	10x
Core i7-3840QMIntel $549Bench 66%, 3,981 samples	9x
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 680MNvidiaBench 19%, 1,365 samples	11x
GTX 670MXNvidiaBench 12%, 2,325 samples	7x
GTX 670MNvidiaBench 10%, 2,951 samples	4x

SSD
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	7x
840 Pro 512GBSamsung $129Bench 96%, 14,996 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C11 4x4GBKingstonBench 64%, 15 samples	3x
Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 53%, 4,121 samples	3x
Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 54%, 160 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $515

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16