Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210201
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 07 '21 at 17:14
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 78.7
1-Core 127
2-Core 256
84% 154 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 779
77% 627 Pts
64-Core 954
59% 954 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
ASRock(1849 5001) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.9% Above average
Lighting 65.7
Reflection 64.6
Parallax 89.1
54% 73.1 fps
MRender 65.2
Gravity 70.4
Splatting 47.7
49% 61.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 850 250GB
23GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 310 309 314 315 299 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 305
Write 347
Mixed 271
SusWrite 314
70% 309 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 15.2
4K Mixed 10.5
38% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 90.9
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 95
81% 117 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 101%
Amd-raid Array 1 999GB
688GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2464 1662 1676 1681 1673 1668 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 1,049
Write 4,927
Mixed 1,336
SusWrite 1,804
522% 2,279 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 22.5
110% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 762
DQ Write 749
DQ Mixed 692
537% 734 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 218%
Great: 411%
Amd-raid CT480BX50 480GB
219GB free
Firmware: M6C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 21 373 169 7.4 7.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 268
Write 331
Mixed 278
SusWrite 97.3
55% 244 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 12.9
4K Mixed 8.2
31% 10 MB/s
DQ Read 63.1
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 0.5
36% 82.2 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 56%
Amd-raid ST2000DX001-1NS1 2TB
319GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 190 190 190 192 192 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 142
Mixed 20
SusWrite 189
94% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 1.3
288% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Amd-raid HGST HDN724040AL 4TB
14GB free
Firmware: MJAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 92 91 92 93 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 136
Write 119
Mixed 38
SusWrite 91.6
70% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 34.8
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 35.6
80% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,861 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $25

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $850
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback