Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 18GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R  (all builds)
Memory14.8 GB free of 18 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '21 at 13:10
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$100
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 82
2-Core 164
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 403
44% 348 Pts
64-Core 401
25% 401 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.8% Average
Lighting 61.2
Reflection 69.9
Parallax 62.5
50% 64.5 fps
MRender 66.8
Gravity 63
Splatting 54.9
50% 61.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
257GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 126 123 121 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 346
Write 216
Mixed 242
SusWrite 118
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 34.5
4K Mixed 23.7
77% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 198
146% 192 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 136 139 140 140 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 128
Write 125
Mixed 71.4
SusWrite 138
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
209% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 101%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
635GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 91 87 93 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 126
Write 118
Mixed 93.4
SusWrite 89.6
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
198% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 85%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 88 90 88 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 68.2
Write 78.3
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 84.9
53% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 67%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
494GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 91 87 93 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 119
Write 123
Mixed 88.3
SusWrite 89.6
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 76%
Hitachi HDS721010DLE630 1TB
41GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 29.1
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 29.2
40% 29 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 18GB
null MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
42.6% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 16
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 10.9
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X58A-UD3R Builds (Compare 2,036 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $397
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback