MSI MS-1763

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GT70 2PE
MotherboardMSI MS-1763  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 22 '17 at 07:48
Run Duration95 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 87
1-Core 106
2-Core 193
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 575
60% 482 Pts
64-Core 581
36% 581 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 880M
MSI(1462 1105) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 993 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.53
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.3% Poor
Lighting 34.2
Reflection 33.3
Parallax 42.3
28% 36.6 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 31.3
29% 36.1 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 42%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial_ CT1050MX30 1TB
338GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 474
Write 332
Mixed 337
84% 381 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 27.1
110% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 90.3
DQ Mixed 53.8
74% 142 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSO8GX3M1A1600C11 0420 AM1L16BC8R2-B1QS 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.8% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 17.1
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 19.5
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1763 Builds (Compare 618 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1763

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback