Acer Aspire A315-42

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-42  (all builds)
MotherboardPK Sleepy_PK
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '21 at 21:43
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 70.3
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 147
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 220
30% 222 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Acer(1025 134D) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.17% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 8.1
5% 7.37 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 10
6% 6.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.17%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX300 120GB-$80
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M2CR021
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 414 402 350 414 411 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 410
Mixed 432
SusWrite 397
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 42.4
150% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 214
172% 242 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 102%
Great: 115%
WDC WD10 SPZX-21Z10T0 1TB
864GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 118 118 118 118 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 65.3
Write 108
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 117
129% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 0.9
261% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SF4641G8CK8IEHLSBG 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (97th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.9% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 13.9
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.5
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A315-42 Builds (Compare 556 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-42

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback