HP ProBook 6550b

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive28.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook 6550b  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 146D
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '21 at 11:39
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Memory 51.6
1-Core 59.8
2-Core 31.6
34% 47.7 Pts
4-Core 88.3
8-Core 132
14% 110 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 122 125 82 58 130 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.7% Poor
Read 209
Write 187
Mixed 158
SusWrite 118
38% 168 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 15.6
4K Mixed 7.6
29% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 83.2
DQ Mixed 31.5
41% 74.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 61%
TDK Trans-it 8GB
3GB free, PID 1e23
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 9.8 10 10 9.9 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
6.17% Terrible
Read 20.5
Write 7.5
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 9.7
12% 10.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.17%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
20.4% Poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 8.1
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 6.4
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 6550b Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 6550b

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback