Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	7.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu LIFEBOOK P770 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU FJNB20F
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100705
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 06 '21 at 08:35
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 U 660 36 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	30.4% Below average	Memory 45.7 1-Core 47.4 2-Core 68 34% 53.7 Pts	4-Core 88.1 8-Core 94.5 12% 91.3 Pts	64-Core 96.4 6% 96.4 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 25,436 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Device(0000 0000) 1GB CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.62 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	7.64% Terrible	Lighting 8.9 Reflection 14.2 Parallax 7.6 7% 10.2 fps	MRender 12.4 Gravity 10.2 Splatting 8.8 8% 10.5 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.64% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSFC128GBSJ 128GB 469 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: CJFA0203 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 165 166 169 160 159 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	35.3% Below average	Read 180 Write 163 Mixed 93.2 SusWrite 163 34% 150 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 28.1 4K Mixed 14.8 54% 18.7 MB/s	DQ Read 16.5 DQ Write 54 DQ Mixed 23.2 21% 31.2 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM 15h Reserved Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.1 MC Write 4.7 MC Mixed 7 16% 5.6 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.13 GB/s	Latency 177 23% 177 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7 U 620IntelBench 32%, 9 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	1x

SSD
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	1x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	1x

Value: 17% - Very poor

Total price: $112