Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_TUF505DU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics70% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive136% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DU_TUF505DU  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DU
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 05 '21 at 22:06
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User LBY-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 66.4
1-Core 109
2-Core 172
66% 116 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 580
57% 464 Pts
64-Core 587
36% 587 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Asus(1043 10AF) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
70% Good
Lighting 88.6
Reflection 91.1
Parallax 79.7
72% 86.5 fps
MRender 94.3
Gravity 78.6
Splatting 71.7
66% 81.5 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 395 397 416 419 416 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 733
Write 620
Mixed 656
SusWrite 418
136% 607 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 52
169% 57.6 MB/s
DQ Read 815
DQ Write 474
DQ Mixed 606
461% 631 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 136%
Great: 187%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 110 109 107 109 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 90.6
Write 122
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 108
68% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.6
201% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 79%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB
15GB free, PID c75c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
8.41% Terrible
Read 30.7
Write 11.7
Mixed 10
SusWrite 12.2
19% 16.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.41%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.8% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 26.4
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 22.6
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DU_TUF505DU Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_TUF505DU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback