Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_TUF505DU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics70.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DU_TUF505DU  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DU
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 05 '21 at 21:51
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User LBY-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 63.1
1-Core 101
2-Core 160
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 275
33% 256 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Asus(1043 10AF) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
70.2% Very good
Lighting 88.8
Reflection 91.4
Parallax 79.8
72% 86.7 fps
MRender 94.3
Gravity 78.6
Splatting 72.6
66% 81.8 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 399 412 419 416 418 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 710
Write 603
Mixed 581
SusWrite 418
130% 578 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 74
4K Mixed 48.1
150% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 736
DQ Write 394
DQ Mixed 530
403% 553 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 126%
Great: 187%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 105 107 108 106 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 96.3
Write 110
Mixed 44.4
SusWrite 107
65% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.5
186% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 79%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB
15GB free, PID c75c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
8.34% Terrible
Read 31.4
Write 10.2
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 12.3
18% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.34%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.3% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 26.2
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 19.8
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DU_TUF505DU Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_TUF505DU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback