Lenovo 80X7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 80X7  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory20.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171019
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateMar 05 '21 at 21:01
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 85.2
2-Core 133
62% 100 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 401
36% 306 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 39FB) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4749
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
4.98% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 7.2
6% 6.73 fps
MRender 9.2
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 0.1
4% 5.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.98%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF107C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 209 303 183 108 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 755
Write 499
Mixed 449
SusWrite 194
105% 474 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 82.1
4K Mixed 43.2
141% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 527
DQ Mixed 323
268% 376 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 104%
Great: 157%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATS1G64HZ-2G3A1 029E CMSX16GX4M1A2400C16 24GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.8% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 19.1
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 18.9
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80X7 Builds (Compare 478 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80X7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback