bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DH67CL
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121204
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 05 '21 at 20:22
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 201
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 373
48% 363 Pts
64-Core 383
24% 383 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
EVGA(3842 1257) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
46.5% Average
Lighting 59
Reflection 57.3
Parallax 58.6
48% 58.3 fps
MRender 63.3
Gravity 52.5
Splatting 46.5
43% 54.1 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 114 93 97 88 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 334
Write 296
Mixed 239
SusWrite 93.8
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 17
4K Mixed 12.6
49% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 17.4
DQ Write 20.5
DQ Mixed 17.9
14% 18.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
562GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 124 94 98 88 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 166
Write 154
Mixed 95.6
SusWrite 96.1
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
217GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 169 167 169 169 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 122
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 165
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-067.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/4G 99U5403-067.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/4G 16GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 15.3
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,390 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback