Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics56.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '21 at 17:19
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
44.8% Average
Memory 63
1-Core 54.1
2-Core 94.3
44% 70.5 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 157
21% 156 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.9% Above average
Lighting 69.8
Reflection 81.8
Parallax 73.5
57% 75 fps
MRender 76.1
Gravity 70.9
Splatting 64.5
57% 70.5 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 146 69 59 79 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 322
Write 214
Mixed 202
SusWrite 94.6
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 19.8
4K Mixed 18.1
60% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 19.7
DQ Write 26.9
DQ Mixed 20.2
16% 22.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
298GB free
Firmware: HP36
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 147 70 60 79 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 136
Write 148
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 94.9
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0- Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
33.2% Below average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 11.8
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 10
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-HD2 Builds (Compare 274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2 - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $224
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback