Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Pro3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory20.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '21 at 03:27
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 77.7
1-Core 71.1
2-Core 140
58% 96.4 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 417
42% 340 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 141
Parallax 128
106% 133 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 134
Splatting 120
101% 123 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$235
1TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 297 380 409 393 413 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 437
Mixed 416
SusWrite 340
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 46.7
153% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 44.5
DQ Mixed 207
140% 175 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 79 70 76 76 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 483
Write 438
Mixed 328
SusWrite 92
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 64.7
4K Mixed 41.3
138% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 172
149% 221 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 79%
Great: 118%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 249GB
116GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 278 300 297 299 305 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 434
Mixed 397
SusWrite 278
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 54.5
4K Mixed 43.6
137% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 251
188% 252 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 127%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$79
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 117 117 117 117 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 91.5
Write 101
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 115
68% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.5
188% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Xtreem-LV-2666 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.9% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 14.8
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 12.6
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 789 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback