HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1850
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130816
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateMar 04 '21 at 22:19
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5300B APU
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 99.2
1-Core 54.3
2-Core 56
52% 69.8 Pts
4-Core 83.6
8-Core 69.9
11% 76.8 Pts
64-Core 39.7
2% 39.7 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7480D
HP(103C 1850) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.21% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 2.3
2% 3.07 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.4
3% 3.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.21%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 95 102 100 99 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 90.7
Write 96.3
Mixed 59
SusWrite 98.8
63% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 70%
UFD 3.0 Silicon-Power32G 32GB
29GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 6.6 7.8 7.2 7.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
8.31% Terrible
Read 32.2
Write 11.8
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 6.3
15% 14 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
58% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.31%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
U 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18% Very poor
MC Read 3
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 4.1
10% 3.33 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 9.4
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 40.2
100% 40.2 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 18%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6305 SFF Builds (Compare 484 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback