Acer Aspire 5750

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAcer Aspire 5750  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JE50_HR
Memory2 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '17 at 22:37
Run Duration95 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2330M-$150
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
56% Above average
Memory 87.1
1-Core 58
2-Core 115
55% 86.6 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 148
20% 147 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Acer(1025 0504) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2843
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.88% Terrible
Lighting 2.07
Reflection 3.08
Parallax 1.38
2% 2.17 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.83
2% 2.62 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.88%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$79
279GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.01A11 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 63.5
Write 61.3
Mixed 53.4
44% 59.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.35
86% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SH564288FH8NWPHSFR SH564568FH8NZPHSCR 3GB
1333, 1333 MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
43.1% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 13.8
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 12.4
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 5750 Builds (Compare 354 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5750

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $81
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback