TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI B450M PRO-M2 MAX (MS-7B84)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B84
MotherboardMSI B450M PRO-M2 MAX (MS-7B84)  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200610
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 03 '21 at 13:04
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 76.6
1-Core 115
2-Core 226
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 692
66% 546 Pts
64-Core 921
57% 921 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑
This bench: 75.5%
 Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.3% Poor
Lighting 35.7
Reflection 40.3
Parallax 38.1
29% 38 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 37.6
Splatting 0.1
18% 25.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 25.3%
 Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot P200 256GB
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 24 95 42 41 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 502
Write 422
Mixed 392
SusWrite 114
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 19.3
106% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 95.8
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 0.8
65% 148 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 68.2%
 Great: 93%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
339GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 103 104 104 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 98.2
Write 100
Mixed 41.8
SusWrite 103
63% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑
This bench: 57.7%
 Great: 61%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
11GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 5.4 4.9 7.8 7.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.88% Terrible
Read 25.7
Write 27.9
Mixed 9.9
SusWrite 6.2
22% 17.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
19% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 5.88%
 Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5734-036.A00G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 31.5
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 36.2
SC Mixed 29.7
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 95.4%
 Great: 95%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical B450M PRO-M2 MAX (MS-7B84) Builds (Compare 3,939 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450M PRO-M2 MAX (MS-7B84)

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples1,039x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD  $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples506x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD  $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples223x
GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia  $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples262x
RTX 2060Nvidia  $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples238x
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples197x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples112x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples98x
SA400M8240G 240GBKingstonBench 70%, 27,523 samples57x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples233x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples137x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples107x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $349
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback