Asus X99-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-PRO  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 03 '21 at 12:17
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Memory 96.2
1-Core 127
2-Core 253
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 760
79% 632 Pts
64-Core 743
46% 743 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 95%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 143
Parallax 141
107% 139 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 140
Splatting 120
105% 130 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 105%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,606
Write 1793
Mixed 1,318
420% 1,906 MB/s
4K Read 56.3
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 76.3
257% 90.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,164
DQ Write 1,026
DQ Mixed 1,082
815% 1,091 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 393%
Seagate NAS HDD 4TB-$145
504GB free
Firmware: SC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 150 153 152 153 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 100
Write 99.3
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 152
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 100%
WDC WD7500BPKT-0 750GB
457GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 102 112 111 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 99.8
Write 101
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 108
118% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GD3200C16K2E 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
144% Outstanding
MC Read 55.8
MC Write 62.9
MC Mixed 50
161% 56.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 27.4
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 53.2
75% 53.2 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 144%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-PRO Builds (Compare 373 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO - $320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $1,086
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback