Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4170-$20 48,178 User benchmarks, average bench 57% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	Memory 69.7 1-Core 49.6 2-Core 56.2 41% 58.5 Pts	4-Core 186 8-Core 256 28% 221 Pts	64-Core 246 15% 246 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz) 64,721 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 3098) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4963 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	2.4% Terrible	Lighting 2.7 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 3.8 2% 2.73 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4.4 3% 3.27 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.4% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 158GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF220400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 94 118 109 108 92 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	Read 354 Write 312 Mixed 237 SusWrite 123 57% 256 MB/s	4K Read 9.1 4K Write 11 4K Mixed 7.4 29% 9.17 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 80.7 DQ Mixed 9.2 30% 65 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 55%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23 40,922 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 301GB free Firmware: AX001A SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 88 87 82 89 89 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	49.4% Average	Read 87.2 Write 88.9 Mixed 32 SusWrite 84.7 53% 73.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GB 12,268 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	26.8% Poor	MC Read 8.7 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 7.6 24% 8.57 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 9.2 27% 9.53 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16