Dell Studio XPS 8100

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive65.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemDell Studio XPS 8100
MotherboardDell Studio XPS 8100  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091209
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 02 '21 at 16:14
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$339
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 94
1-Core 81.3
2-Core 162
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 367
40% 314 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 260-$250
Nvidia(10DE 0738) 1.8GB
Ram: 1.8GB, Driver: 341.44
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
6.13% Terrible
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 3.8
7% 7.83 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 3.5
5% 6.17 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.13%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 213 204 184 110 90 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.3% Good
Read 233
Write 151
Mixed 211
SusWrite 172
43% 192 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 59.2
4K Mixed 33.5
118% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 36.1
72% 144 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
271GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 92 93 93 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 98
Write 97.4
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 93
64% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 68%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
5TB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 23 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 24.8
Write 20.7
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 23.4
30% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.6
138% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
43.2% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 12.9
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 8100 Builds (Compare 669 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Studio XPS 8100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $492
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback