Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 191%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 180%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics200% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '21 at 11:20
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$199
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Memory 95.1
1-Core 157
2-Core 310
102% 187 Pts
4-Core 532
8-Core 954
89% 743 Pts
64-Core 1,141
71% 1,141 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$835
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 5475 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
200% Outstanding
Lighting 296
Reflection 261
Parallax 293
241% 283 fps
MRender 321
Gravity 244
Splatting 174
194% 246 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 200%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 790 615 600 559 422 569 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1,871
Write 1,705
Mixed 617
SusWrite 592
266% 1,196 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 57.2
210% 80.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1101
DQ Write 1190
DQ Mixed 865
728% 1052 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 226%
Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
146GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 297 297 295 295 299 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 410
Write 420
Mixed 382
SusWrite 309
86% 380 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 99.7
4K Mixed 54.4
183% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 359
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
410GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1195 1157 592 597 604 593 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 1,391
Write 1,124
Mixed 1,041
SusWrite 789
243% 1,087 MB/s
4K Read 57.5
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 85.1
272% 95 MB/s
DQ Read 1,592
DQ Write 1,434
DQ Mixed 1,454
1,107% 1,493 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 256%
Great: 340%
Seagate IronWolf 2TB (2016)-$105
91GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 87 141 123 126 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 107
Write 109
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 111
72% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 100%
Seagate Expansion+ 1TB
209GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 120 99 79 71 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 81.3
Write 135
Mixed 97.3
SusWrite 98.2
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.6
175% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3000C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3000C16-8GTZR 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
MC Read 35.8
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 28.9
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 38.3
SC Mixed 27.8
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 56.9
70% 56.9 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING Builds (Compare 10,602 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $992
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback