Notebook W94_95_97JU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive67.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemNotebook W94_95_97JU  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W94_95_97JU
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160905
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 02 '21 at 06:53
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 71.1
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 174
64% 112 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 263
35% 260 Pts
64-Core 255
16% 255 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Clevo(1558 0941) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.49% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 7
5% 6.17 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 9.9
6% 7.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.49%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 275GB-$42
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 180 52 77 42 233 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 342
Write 326
Mixed 280
SusWrite 156
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 31.8
106% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 301
215% 273 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 95%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
981GB free
Firmware: 2BE10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 95 96 95 96 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 89.2
Write 83
Mixed 54
SusWrite 96.8
59% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 70%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
646GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 32 32 32 34 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 29
Write 26
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 32.4
39% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.M16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
55.4% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 18.6
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 17.5
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 98.8
40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W94_95_97JU Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W94_95_97JU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback