Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion KQ431AA-B14 a6312.be (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTek Leonite2
Memory	1.3 GB free of 7 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20070727
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 01 '21 at 20:44
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	56%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Dual E2200-$54 8,325 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	28% Poor	Memory 48.1 1-Core 13.4 2-Core 42.5 24% 34.7 Pts	4-Core 49 8-Core 44.1 6% 46.5 Pts	64-Core 44.4 3% 44.4 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430 22,369 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Device(0000 0000) 1GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	1.55% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 0.7 2% 1.47 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 2 Splatting 1.7 2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.55% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 171GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 201 198 199 207 87 MB/s Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.2% Below average	Read 232 Write 191 Mixed 43.4 SusWrite 179 36% 161 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 20.2 4K Mixed 12.7 48% 15.6 MB/s	DQ Read 108 DQ Write 82.8 DQ Mixed 1 26% 63.8 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 7GB 8,824 User benchmarks, average bench 24% null MHz 1024, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	MC Read 3.6 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.47 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 3 8% 2.7 GB/s	Latency 168 24% 168 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16