HP Laptop 14s-cf3xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Laptop 14s-cf3xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 868C
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 01 '21 at 16:51
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 128
2-Core 250
83% 152 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 325
43% 324 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
HP(103C 868C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
4.69% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 7.4
6% 7.23 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 0.4
3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.69%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 408 344 323 308 305 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1,199
Write 1,150
Mixed 997
SusWrite 350
207% 924 MB/s
4K Read 47.8
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 65.7
238% 88.8 MB/s
DQ Read 798
DQ Write 682
DQ Mixed 718
544% 733 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 175%
Great: 197%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
593GB free
Firmware: RTM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 103 105 100 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
52% Above average
Read 79.3
Write 123
Mixed 55
SusWrite 102
66% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 52%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.B2GG5.AU20B Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GB
2667, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.8% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 23.8
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 24
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 14s-cf3xxx Builds (Compare 210 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14s-cf3xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $547Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback