Zoostorm 7200-5044A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics41.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemZoostorm 7200-5044A  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte B85-HD3
Memory15.8 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140924
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 01 '21 at 00:41
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 88.7
1-Core 114
2-Core 227
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 593
64% 510 Pts
64-Core 594
37% 594 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.5% Average
Lighting 49.4
Reflection 61.2
Parallax 55.6
40% 55.4 fps
MRender 64.3
Gravity 52.6
Splatting 46.9
44% 54.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G32MNB-2200A 128GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10103L00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 468
Write 310
Mixed 287
78% 355 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 94.2
4K Mixed 26.7
121% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 149
135% 211 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 88%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
265GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 450 454 462 462 462 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 459
Mixed 419
SusWrite 455
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 55.5
186% 67.2 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 295
240% 341 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 122%
Great: 125%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
366GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 118 120 121 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 122
Write 125
Mixed 85.4
SusWrite 120
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.M16 Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6K1 1315 CT102464BA160B.C16 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.8% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 14.7
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 16.8
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7200-5044A Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: Zoostorm 7200-5044A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $369
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback