Gigabyte GA-MA790FXT-UD5P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MA790FXT-UD5P  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20101110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '21 at 23:41
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X3 720
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
50.6% Above average
Memory 82.3
1-Core 40.6
2-Core 78.3
46% 67.1 Pts
4-Core 116
8-Core 98.8
15% 107 Pts
64-Core 109
7% 109 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 4870
PwrHis(1787 2266) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
8.09% Terrible
Lighting 11
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 8.1
9% 10.3 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 7.7
Splatting 8
6% 7.77 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.09%
Great: 12%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Performance 320GB
231GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0956
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 51 48 100 99 98 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.5% Average
Read 96.5
Write 105
Mixed 46
SusWrite 75.4
59% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
30.6% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 11.5
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.9
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MA790FXT-UD5P Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA790FXT-UD5P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $183
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback