Asus TUF Gaming FX705DU_TUF765DU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	7.93% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX705DU_TUF765DU (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX705DU
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200922
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 28 '21 at 20:06
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 42,271 User benchmarks, average bench 54% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Memory 67.7 1-Core 110 2-Core 188 69% 122 Pts	4-Core 278 8-Core 433 44% 355 Pts	64-Core 430 27% 430 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics 37,264 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 19.10.30.02 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	7.93% Terrible	Lighting 8.5 Reflection 90.9 Parallax 14.4 7% 37.9 fps	MRender 10.7 Gravity 12.8 Splatting 12.4 10% 12 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.93% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB 16,774 User benchmarks, average bench 141% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20110000 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 736 Write 626 Mixed 645 149% 669 MB/s	4K Read 41.7 4K Write 94 4K Mixed 56.4 185% 64 MB/s	DQ Read 636 DQ Write 537 DQ Mixed 568 431% 580 MB/s
Poor: 86% Great: 187%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 523GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 113 97 117 117 117 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	75% Very good	Read 147 Write 138 Mixed 55.2 SusWrite 113 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 6.4 4K Mixed 0.6 244% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 79%
USB DISK 3.0 32GB 310 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 29GB free, PID 5100 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 8.1 8.9 8.5 8.5 8.1 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 38.3 Write 26.7 Mixed 22.6 SusWrite 10.5 30% 24.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.3 106% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 23%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 123GB 3,538 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 44GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 49 36 40 39 37 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	40.3% Average	Read 158 Write 78.9 Mixed 58.1 SusWrite 44.8 99% 84.9 MB/s	4K Read 6.4 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 3.1 197% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB 43,895 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (91^st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	83% Excellent	MC Read 30.4 MC Write 32.9 MC Mixed 27.1 86% 30.1 GB/s	SC Read 21.2 SC Write 32.5 SC Mixed 23.5 74% 25.7 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX705DU_TUF765DU Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX705DU_TUF765DU

CPU
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	25x

GPU
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	16x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	9x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	13x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	6x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	4x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	10x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	5x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16