HP ProLiant ML350p Gen8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory512GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 512GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemHP ProLiant ML350p Gen8  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory500.9 GB free of 511.984 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20190524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '21 at 02:10
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
Proc 1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 95.1
2-Core 185
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 673
60% 506 Pts
64-Core 2,520
156% 2,520 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 240GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8.32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 112 110 112 115 116 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.2% Below average
Read 118
Write 118
Mixed 131
SusWrite 118
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 22.3
4K Mixed 17.7
59% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 139
120% 180 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 98%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 600GB
557GB free
Firmware: 8.32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 305 311 309 311 311 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 38% Great: 102%
HP MSA 2040 SAS 42TB
39TB free
Firmware: G22x
SusWrite @10s intervals: 737 665 655 663 664 669 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HP 712384-081 16x31.9GB
16 of 24 slots used
511GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 60.2
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 31
119% 41.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 2.9
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 100%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant ML350p Gen8 Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProLiant ML350p Gen8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 239% - Outstanding Total price: $145
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback