| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160520 |
| Uptime | 0.8 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 26 '21 at 12:22 |
| Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
| Run User | LTU-User |
| Background CPU | 38% |
PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
51.6%
Above average
|
55% 104 Pts
|
45% 338 Pts
|
21% 341 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.6%
Poor
|
27% 35.2 fps
|
25% 31.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
V Series SATA SSD 120GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 73 61 66 66 68 MB/s
|
36.4%
Below average
|
48% 216 MB/s
|
45% 17.3 MB/s
|
47% 98.5 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$29
396GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 141 149 151 151 146 MB/s
|
86.3%
Excellent
|
85% 118 MB/s
|
138% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Goodram GR2133D464L15/8G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
28.9%
Poor
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
26% 9.07 GB/s
|
22% 183 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 5,905 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-K
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 1,111x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 636x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 553x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 837x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 467x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 366x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $197 |