Acer Predator G3-710

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics75.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator G3-710  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator G3-710
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151007
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '21 at 08:11
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 90.6
1-Core 122
2-Core 234
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 654
68% 547 Pts
64-Core 642
40% 642 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.2% Very good
Lighting 91.5
Reflection 106
Parallax 95.4
75% 97.6 fps
MRender 93.8
Gravity 92.4
Splatting 93.5
76% 93.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV1-8B256 256GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: G881201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 322 209 231 217 230 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 367
Write 341
Mixed 304
SusWrite 242
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 89.8
4K Mixed 35.3
132% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 25.9
DQ Write 86.5
DQ Mixed 160
93% 90.9 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 33 40 46 31 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Write 1
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 47.1
16% 21.3 MB/s
4K Write 0.3
17% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
74.9% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 23.8
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 24.2
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G3-710 Builds (Compare 2,892 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

System: Acer Predator G3-710

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $494
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback