Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110510
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '21 at 09:17
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 84.7
2-Core 170
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 329
41% 313 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
931GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 75 75 79 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 132
Write 131
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 76.4
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
224% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 75%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
724GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 63 55 60 61 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Read 43.7
Write 69.4
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 59.3
39% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
77% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 69%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
298GB free
Firmware: CP100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 75 75 79 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 79
Write 32.1
Mixed 52.6
SusWrite 76.4
44% 60 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
50% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 961 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $229
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback