HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150713
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '21 at 23:35
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 101
2-Core 189
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 361
42% 324 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Nvidia(10DE 0973) 1GB
CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
8.33% Terrible
Lighting 9.1
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 11.1
7% 10.8 fps
MRender 14.1
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 11.1
10% 12.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.33%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P3-128 128GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 62 65 68 66 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 302
Write 124
Mixed 128
SusWrite 63.8
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 26.9
4K Mixed 15.6
57% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 18.4
DQ Write 39.1
DQ Mixed 19.1
17% 25.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
74GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 67 69 66 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 117
Write 104
Mixed 51.3
SusWrite 65.8
62% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
72GB free
Firmware: SD1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 83 83 82 83 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 73.5
Write 14.2
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 82.1
42% 55.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.1% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 8.1
26% 9.17 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 8.9
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback